Navigation überspringen.
Startseite
Indologica
Startseite » Weblogs » Weblog von pw

Critical Readings on the History of Tibetan Foreign Relations

Verfasst von pw am Di, 03/26/2013 - 23:05.

Mullard, Saul [Hrsg.]:
Critical Readings on the History of Tibetan Foreign Relations / ed. by Saul Mullard. - Vol. 1-4. - Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 2013. - (Critical Readings). - Vol. 1: xiv, 422 S., Vol. 2: xiv, 268 S., Vol. 3: xiv, 320 S., Vol. 4: xiv, 478 S.
ISBN 978-90-04-21224-4
EUR 780,00 / US$ 1068,00
DDC: 951.5; 327.515

Beschreibung
In Critical Readings on the History of Tibetan Foreign Relations Saul Mullard has presented some of the world's leading academic contributions to the history of Tibetan contacts with other nations and states. This selection of key texts manages to chart the historical development of Tibet and her position in the politics and history of Central, South and East Asia. Beginning with the Tibetan Empire period, this work explores the important linguistic, diplomatic, cultural and religious connections that shaped the history and culture of, not only Tibet, but also that of Central Asia, Mongolia, China and India. This work also explores Tibet's contemporary position in international relations, particularly with regards to India, China and the West. This major work provides both established and new scholars a unique and valuable reference work on Tibet's longstanding cultural, religious and linguistic relationships and connections with her neighbours. [Verlagsinformation]

Inhalt nach dem Brill-Flyer
Volume 1: Early Tibetan Contacts and Relationships Until the Mid 15th Century
INTRODUCTION
THE POLITICS AND CULTURAL IMPACT OF THE TIBETAN IMPERIAL PERIOD
1. Beckwith, C. I., “The Tibetans in the Ordos and North China: Considerations on the Role of the Tibetan Empire in World History”, in Beckwith, C.I., Silver on Lapis (Tibet Society, 1987), pp. 3-11.
2. Beckwith, C. I., “The Tibetan Empire in the West”, in Aris, Michael & Suu Kyi, Aung San, eds., Tibetan Studies in Honour of Hugh Richardson. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Tibetan Studies, Oxford 1979 (Aris and Phillips, Ltd, 1980), pp. 30-38.
3. Dotson, B., “The ‘Nephew –Uncle’ Relationship in the International Diplomacy of the Tibetan Empire (7th–9th Centuries)” in Dotson, B. et al, eds., Proceedings of the first ISYT conference (Chicago Serindia, 2009), pp. 223-238.
4. Yihong Pan, “The Sino-Tibetan Treaties in the Tang Dynasty”, T’oung Pao, Second Series, Vol. 78, Livr. 1/3 (1992), pp. 116-161.
5. Takeuchi, Tsuguhito, “Sociolinguistic Implications of the Use of Tibetan in East Turkestan from the End of Tibetan Domination through the Tangut Period (9th-12th c.)”, in Durkin-Meisterernst, D. et al, ed., Turfan Revisited: The First Century of Research into the Arts and Cultures of the Silk Road (Dietrich Reimer Verlag, 2004), pp. 341-348.
6. Uebach, H., “dByar-mo-thaṅ and Goṅ-bu ma-ru. Tibetan Historiographical Tradition on the Treaty of 821/823”, in Steinkellner, E., ed., Tibetan History and Language: Studies dedicated to Uray Géza on his Seventieth Birthday (Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien, 1991), pp. 497-526.
TANGUT AND NORTH-EASTERN TIBETAN RELATIONS
7. Horlemann, B., “The Relations of the Eleventh Century Tsong Kha Tribal Confederation to its Neighbour States on the Silk Road,” in Kapstein, M.T., Dotson, B., eds., Contributions to the Cultural History of Early Tibet (Brill, 2007), pp. 79-101.
8. Sperling, E., “’Lama to the King of Hsia’”, The Journal of the Tibet Society, Vol. 7 (1987), pp. 31-50.
TIBETAN-MONGOLIAN RELATIONS
9. Everding, K.-H., “The Mongol States and their Struggle for Dominance over Tibet in the 13th Century” in Blezer, H., ed., Tibet, Past and Present (PIATS 2000) (Brill, 2002), pp. 109-128.
10. Petech, L., “Yüan Organization of the Tibetan Border Areas”, in Uebach, H., Panglung, J.L., eds., Tibetan Studies PIATS IV 1985 (Kommission für zentralasiatische Studien, 1988), pp. 369-380.
11. van der Kuijp, L.W.J., “Jambhala: An Imperial Envoy to Tibet during the Late Yuan”, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 113, No. 4 (1993), pp. 529-538.
BUDDHIST CONTACTS WITH INDIA AND EAST ASIA
12. Kapstein, M.T., “From Korea to Tibet: Action at a Distance in the Early Medieval World System”, in Kapstein, M.T., The Tibetan Assimilation of Buddhism: Conversion, Contestation, and Memory (Oxford University Press, 2000), Chapter 5, pp. 69-84.
13. Vitali, R., “In the Presence of the ‘Diamond Throne’: Tibetans at rDo rje gdan (Last Quarter of the 12th Century to Year 1300)”, Tiber Journal Special Issue 2010, Vol. XXXIV, No. 3 & 4 / Vol. XXXV, No.1 & 2 (2010).
14. Shastri, L., “Activities of Indian Paṇḍitas in Tibet from the 14th to the 17th Century”, in Blezer, H., ed., Tibet, Past and Present (PIATS 2000) (Brill, 2002), pp. 129-145.
MING DYNASTY-TIBETAN RELATIONS
15. Schwieger, P., “Significance of Ming titles conferred upon the Phag mo gru rulers: A Reevaluation of Chinese-Tibetan Relations during the Ming Dynasty”, Tiber Journal Special Issue 2010, Vol. XXXIV, No. 3 & 4 / Vol. XXXV, No.1 & 2 (2010).
16. Slobodník, M. “The Relations Between the Chinese Ming Dynasty and the Tibetan Ruling House of Phag-mo-gru in the Years 1368-1434: Political and Religious Aspects”, Asian and African Studies, Vol. 13, No. 2 (2004), pp. 155-171.
17. Sperling, E., “Did the Early Ming Emperors Attempt to Implement a ‘Divide and Rule’ Policy in Tibet?” in Steinkellner, E., Tauscher, H., eds., Contributions on Tibetan Language, History and Culture. Proceedings of the Csoma de Kőrös Symposium Held at Velm-Vienna, Austria, 13-19 September 1981 (Vienna, 1983), pp. 339- 356.
18. Schwieger, P., “A Document of Chinese Diplomatic Relations with East Tibet during the Ming Dynasty”, in Maurer, P., Schwieger, P., eds., Tibetstudien. Festschrift für Dieter Schuh zum 65. Geburtstag (Bier’sche Verlagsanstalt, 2007), pp. 209-226.
19. Greatrex, R., “Bonpo Tribute Missions to the Imperial Court (1400-1665)”, in Steinkellner, E., ed., Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 7th Seminar of IATS, Graz 1995, Volume I (Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1997), pp. 327-336.
Volume 2: The Late Medieval Period C.1500-1750
20. Karmay, Samten G., “The Fifth Dalai Lama and His Reunification of Tibet”, in Pommaret, F., ed., Lhasa in the Seventeenth Century (Brill, 2003), pp. 65–80.
TIBETAN RELATIONS WITH THE QING DYNASTY
21. Ishihama Yumiko, “The Notion of ‘Buddhist Government’ (chos srid) Shared by Tibet, Mongol and Manchu in the Early 17th Century”, in Cüppers, C., ed., The Relationship Between Religion and State (chos srid zung ’brel) In Traditional Tibet (Lumbini International Research Institute, 2004), pp. 15-32.
22. Tuttle, G., “A Tibetan Buddhist Mission to the East: The Fifth Dalai Lama’s Journey to Beijing, 1652-1653” in Cuevas, B.J., Schaeffer, K.R., eds., Power, Politics, and the Reinvention of Tradition (PIATS 10) (Brill, 2006), pp. 65-87.
23. Tsyrempilov, N., “Dge lugs pa divided: Some aspects of the political role of Tibetan Buddhism in the expansion of the Qing dynasty” in Cuevas, B.J., Schaeffer, K.R., eds., Power, Politics, and the Reinvention of Tradition (PIATS 10) (Brill, 2006), pp. 47-64.
24. Nietupski, P., “Sino Tibetan Relations in Eighteenth Century Labrang” in Buffetrille, K., Diemberger, H., eds., Territory and Identity in Tibet and the Himalayas (PIATS 9) (Brill, 2002), pp. 121- 133.
25. Petech, L., “The Dsungar Invasion of 1717” & “Dsungar Occupation and Tibetan Risings”, excerpt from China and Tibet in the Early 18th Century: History of the Establishment of Chinese Protectorate in Tibet, (Chapter 3, and Chapter 4) (Brill, 1950), pp. 25-54.
26. Ishihama Yumiko, “New Light on the ‘Chinese Conquest of Tibet’ in 1720 (Based on the New Manchu Sources)”, in Steinkellner, E., ed., Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 7th Seminar of IATS, Graz 1995, Volume I (Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1997), pp. 419-426.
27. Greatrex, R. “A Brief Introduction to the First Jinchuan War (1747-1749)”, in Kværne, P., ed., Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Fagernes 1992, Vol. 1 (The Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture, 1994), pp. 247-263.
RELATIONS IN THE HIMALAYAS: LADAKH, NEPAL AND BHUTAN
28. Halkias, G.T., “Until the Feathers of the Winged Black Raven Turn White: Sources for the Tibet-Bashahr Treaty of 1679”, in Bray, J., De Rossi Filibeck, E., eds., Mountains, Monasteries and Mosques. Recent Research on Ladakh and the Western Himalaya (Sapienza, 2009), Volume LXXX, pp. 61-86.
29. Petech, L., “The Tibetan-Ladakhi-Moghul War (1679-1683)”, in Petech, L., ed., Selected Papers on Asian History (Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente, 1988), pp. 19-44.
30. Emmer, G., “Dga’ ldan Tshe dbang dpal bzang po and the Tibet- Ladakh-Mughal War of 1679-84” in Bulag, U.E., Diemberger, H.G.M., eds., The Mongolia-Tibet Interface (PIATS 10) (Brill, 2007), pp. 81-107.
31. Schwieger, P., “Kathog Rigzin Tsewang Norbu’s (Kah-thog-rig- `dzin Tshe-dbang-nor-bu) diplomatic mission to Ladakh in the 18th century” in Osmaton, H., Tsering, N., eds., Recent Research on Ladakh, Vol. 6, Proceedings of the Sixth International Colloquium on Ladakh, Leh 1993 (University of Bristol, 1996), pp. 219-230.
32. Cüppers, C., “A Letter Written by the Fifth Dalai Lama to the King of Bhaktapur”, Journal of the Nepal Research Centre, Vol. 12 (2001), pp. 39-42.
33. Ardussi, J.A., “The Rapprochement between Bhutan and Tibet under the Enlightened Rule of Sde-srid XIII Shes-rab-dbang-phyug (r.1744-63)”, Journal of Bhutan Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1999), pp. 64-83.
Volume 3: Towards the Modern Period
TIBETAN RELATIONS WITH EUROPEAN POWERS
34. Lamb, A., “Tibet in Anglo-Chinese Relations: 1767–1842: Part I”, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. 89, No. 3-4 (1957), pp. 161- 176.
35. Lamb, A., “Tibet in Anglo-Chinese Relations: 1767–1842: Part II”, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. 90, No. 1-2 (1958), pp. 26-43.
36. Engelhardt, I., “The Closing of the Gates: Tibetan-European Relations at the End of the Eighteenth Century”, in Blezer, H., ed., Tibet, Past and Present (PIATS 2000) (Brill, 2002), pp. 229-245.
37. Andreyev, A., “Russian Buddhists in Tibet, from the End of the Nineteenth Century – 1930”, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland (Third Series), Vol. 11, No. 3 (2001), pp. 349- 362.
38. McKay, A., “19th century British Expansion on the Indo- Tibetan Frontier: A Forward Perspective,” The Tibet Journal, Vol. 38, No. 4 (2003), pp. 61-76.
39. Andreyev, A., “The Tsar’s Generals and Tibet. Apropos of some ‘white spots’ in the history of Russo-Tibetan relations”, in McKay, A., ed., Tibet and Her Neighbours: A History (Editions Hansjörg Mayer, 2003), pp. 167-173.
40. Song, L., “The Younghusband Expedition and China’s Policy Towards Tibet,1903-1904”, in Kværne, P., ed., Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 6th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Fagernes 1992, Vol. 2 (The Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture, 1994), pp. 789-800.
41. McKay, A.C., “The Establishment of the British Trade Agencies in Tibet: A Survey”, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland (Third Series), Vol. 2, No. 3 (1992), pp. 399-421.
SINO-TIBETAN RELATIONS
42. Sperling, E. “Awe and Submission: A Tibetan Aristocrat at the Court of Qianlong,” The International History Review, Vol. 20, No. 2 (June, 1998), pp. 325-335.
43. Xiangyun Wang, “The Qing Court’s Tibet Connection: Lcang skya Rol pa’i rdo rje and the Qianlong Emperor”, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, Vol. 60, No. 1 (2000), pp. 125-163.
44. Richardson, H., “A Ch’ing Missive to Tibet” [1816] in Richardson, H., ed., High Peaks, Pure Earth: Collected Writings on Tibetan History and Culture (Serindia Publications, 1998), pp. 399-408.
TIBET AND THE HIMALAYA IN THE MODERN PERIOD
45. Bray, J., Gonkatsang, T.D., “Three 19th Century Documents from Tibet and the Lo Phyag Mission from Leh to Lhasa” in Bray, J., De Rossi Filibeck, E., eds., Mountains, Monasteries and Mosques. Recent Research on Ladakh and the Western Himalaya (Sapienza, 2009), Volume LXXX, pp. 97-116.
46. Mishra, T.P., “A Critical Assessment of the Nepal-Tibet Treaty 1856” in McKay, A., ed., Tibet and Her Neighbours: A History (Editions Hansjörg Mayer, 2003), pp. 136-146.
47. Steinmann, B., “The Political and Diplomatic Role of a Tibetan Village Chieftain (‘go-ba) on the Nepalese Frontier”, in Steinkellner, E., ed., Tibetan History and Language: Studies dedicated to Uray Géza on his 70th Birthday (Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien, 1991), pp. 467-486.
EASTERN TIBET
48. Van Spengen, W., “Frontier History of Southern Kham: Banditry and War in the Multi-ethnic Fringe Lands of Chatring, Mili and Gyethang, 1890-1940” in Epstein, L., ed., Khams pa Histories: Visions of People, Place and Authority (PIATS 2000) (Brill, 2002), pp. 7-29.
49. Coleman, W.M., “The Uprising at Batang: Khams and its Significance in Chinese and Tibetan History” in Epstein, L., ed., Khams pa Histories: Visions of People, Place and Authority (PIATS 2000) (Brill, 2002), pp. 31-56.
Volume 4: Tibetan Relations in Recent History Until 2008
FRONTIER POLITICS AND INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMACY
50. Van Walt, M.C., “Whose Game? Records of India Office Concerning Events Leading up to the Simla Conference” in Aziz, B.N., Kapstein, M., eds., Soundings in Tibetan Civilization (Manohar Publications, 1985), pp. 215-230.
51. Gupta, K., “The McMahon Line 1911-45: The British Legacy”, The China Quarterly, No. 47 (1971), pp. 521-545.
52. Christie, C. “Great Britain, China and the Status of Tibet, 1914- 21”, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 10, No. 4 (1976), pp. 481-508.
53. Mehra, P., “A Forgotten Chapter in the History of the Northeast Frontier: 1914-36”, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 31, No. 2 (1972), pp. 299-308.
54. Lamb, A., “Eastern Tibet and Anglo-Chinese Negotiations, 1919-1920”, in Lamb, A., Tibet, China and India 1914-1950: A History of Imperial Diplomacy (Roxford Books, 1989), Chapter IV, pp. 83-105.
55. Majumdar, K. . “Nepal, Tibet, China and India, 1923-33: Tangled Web of Himalayan Politics”, South Asian Studies: Bi-Annual Journal of the South Asia Studies Centre, Vol. 25, No. 1-2 (1990), pp. 144-168.
56. Shakya, T.W., “Tibet and The League of Nations with reference to letters found in The India Office Library, under Sir Charles Bell’s Collections”, The Tibet Journal, Vol. 10, No. 3 (1985), pp. 48-56.
57. Andreyev, A., “Soviet Russia and Tibet: A Debacle of Secret Diplomacy”, The Tibet Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, (1996), pp. 4-34.
58. Peng Wenbin, “Frontier Process, Provincial Politics, and Movements for Khampa Autonomy During the Republican Period” in Epstein, L., ed., Khams pa Histories: Visions of People, Place and Authority (PIATS 2000) (Brill, 2002), pp. 57-84.
THE 1934 REPUBLICAN MISSION TO TIBET
59. Song, L., “General Huang Musong’s Mission to Lhasa and the Sino-Tibetan Negotiations in 1934” in Steinkellner, E., ed., Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 7th Seminar of IATS, Graz 1995, Volume I (Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1997), pp. 903-916.
60. Richardson, H. “General Huang Mu-sung at Lhasa, 1934”, in Richardson, H., ed., High Peaks, Pure Earth: Collected Writings on Tibetan History and Culture (Serindia Publications, 1998), pp. 431-436.
61. Hsiao-ting, L., “The 1934 Chinese Mission to Tibet: A Re- examination”, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland, Vol. 12, No. 3 (2002), pp. 327-341.
TIBET AFTER 1951 AND THE ‘TIBET QUESTION’ IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
62. Goldstein, M.C., “Tibet Appeals to the United Nations”, in Goldstein, M.C., A History of Modern Tibet,Volume II: The Calm Before the Storm, 1951-1955 (University of California Press, 2007), pp. 59-81.
63. Shakya, T., “The Genesis of the Sino-Tibetan Agreement of 1951”, in Kværne, P., ed., Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies Fagernes 1992, Vol. 2 (The Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture, 1994), pp. 739-754.
64. Norbu, D., “Tibet in Sino-Indian Relations: The Centrality of Marginality”, Asian Survey, Vol. 37, No. 11 (November, 1997), pp. 1078-1095.
65. Goldstein, M.C., “Post-Mao Tibet: 1978 to Present (1995)”, excerpt from Tibet, China and the United States: Reflections on the Tibet Question, 1995, pp. 25-52.
66. Guangqui Xu, “The United States and the Tibet Issue”, Asian Survey, Vol. 37, No. 11 (November, 1997), pp. 1062-1077.
67. Grunfeld, A.T., “A Brief Survey of Tibetan Relations with the United States”, in McKay, A., ed., Tibet and Her Neighbours: A History (Editions Hansjörg Mayer, 2003), pp. 197-205.
68. Mathou, T. “Tibet and Its Neighbors: Moving toward a New Chinese Strategy in the Himalayan Region”, Asian Survey, Vol. 45, No. 4 (July/August, 2005), pp. 503-521.
69. Barnett, R., “The Tibet Protests of Spring 2008: Conflict between the Nation and the State”, China Perspectives (Online), Special Feature; The Deadlock in Tibet, No. 3 (2009).
70. Barnett, R., “China, Tibet and the Dynamics of Inland Borders”, The China Heritage Quarterly, No. 27 (September 2011).

Vollständiges Inhaltsverzeichnis

Herausgeber
Saul Mullard, DPhil (Oxford 2009), École Pratique des Hautes Études (Paris), is a specialist in Sikkimese and Tibetan history. He has published one monograph and many articles on the theme of Tibetan and Himalayan history and religion including Opening the Hidden Land: State formation and the construction of Sikkimese history (Brill, 2011). Academia.edu profile.

Quellen: Brill; WorldCat; Amazon (UK); Lehmanns Media; Library of Congress
Bildquelle: Brill
Bibliographie: [1]

References

  1. Mullard, Saul [Hrsg.] (2013).  Critical Readings on the History of Tibetan Foreign Relations. Critical Readings.
»